Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Ann Card Anaesth ; 2015 Jul; 18(3): 317-322
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-162330

ABSTRACT

Background: Laser therapy, for its established analgesic properties with minimal side effects, has been used for the treatment of chronic pain. However, it has not been used for the treatment of acute postoperative pain. This pilot study was designed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of Class IV laser on postoperative pain relief following off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCABG) surgery, as a component of multimodal analgesia (MMA) technique. Methods: This open observational prospective study comprised of 100 adult patients (84 male, 16 female) who underwent OPCABG through sternotomy. For postoperative analgesia, they were subjected to laser therapy subjected to laser therapy in addition to the standard institutional pain management protocol comprising of IV infusion/bolus of tramadol and paracetamol and fentanyl bolus as rescue analgesic. Pain intensity was measured by Verbal Rating Scale (VRS). The laser therapy was scheduled as once a day regime for three consecutive postoperative days (PODs) starting on POD 1, 30 min following tracheal extubation. The subsequent laser applications were also scheduled at the same time of the day as on day 1 if VRS was ≥5. 10 W Class IV laser was applied over 150 cm2 sternal wound area for 150 s. VRS was used to assess pain severity and was recorded for statistical analysis using Friedman Test. Results: The mean (standard deviation [SD]) VRS of all the 100 patients just before application of the first dose of laser was 7.31 (0.94) while on MMT; the same fell to 4.0 (1.279) and 3.40 (2.697) at 1 h and 24 h respectively following first dose of laser. The change of VRS over first 24 h among all the 100 patients was statistically significant (P = 0.000). Laser was re-applied in 40 patients whose VRS was ≥5 (mean [SD] – 6.38 [0.868]) at 24th h. After receiving the 2nd dose of laser the VRS scores fell significantly (P = 0.000) and became 0 at 54th h. No patients required 3rd dose of the laser. No patient required rescue analgesic while on laser therapy. Conclusion: Class IV laser can be an effective technique for postoperative analgesia following OPCABG surgery through sternotomy when included as a component of MMA technique.


Subject(s)
Aged , Analgesia/methods , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Complementary Therapies/methods , Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy/classification , Male , Low-Level Light Therapy/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy
2.
J. oral res. (Impresa) ; 4(3): 183-188, jun.2015. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-779220

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the low level laser therapy (LLLT) in postoperative pain and swelling associated with periapical surgery. A double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial was carried out in 2 groups of 10 patients each, undergoing periapical surgery. The experimental group was treated with an intraoral application of an 810 nm-GaAsAl-laser, having an output power of 100 mW, with overlapping movements over the wound. In the control group, the same procedure was carried out, without therapeutic laser activation. Postoperative pain, swelling, and rescue medication were registered. The experimental group exhibited a decrease in pain intensity after periapical surgery compared with control group (p<0.05). There was not significant statistical difference between the groups in terms of swelling. Six patients of the control group required rescue medication. The use of LLLT in the postoperative management of patients having periapical surgery, using the protocol of this study reduced postoperative pain...


El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la eficacia del láser terapéutico de bajo nivel de emisión (LTBNE) en el dolor postoperatorio e inflamación asociados con cirugía periapical. Se realizó un ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado doble ciego en 2 grupos de 10 pacientes cada uno, que requirieron de cirugía periapical. El grupo experimentalfue tratado con una aplicación intraoral de laser de GaAsAl de 810 nm, con una potencia de 100 Mw, con movimientos oscilatorios sobre la herida quirúrgica. En el grupo control, se llevó a cabo el mismo procedimiento, sin la activación del láser terapéutico. Se registraron dolor postoperatorio, inflamación y medicación de rescate. El grupo experimental mostró una disminución en la intensidad del dolor posterior a la cirugía periapical en comparacióncon el grupo control (p<0.05). No se encontró diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre los grupos entérminos de inflamación. Seis pacientes del grupo control requirieron medicación de rescate. El uso de LTBNE en el manejo postoperatorio de pacientes sometidos a cirugíaperiapical, usando el protocolo del presente estudio redujo el dolor postoperatorio...


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Female , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Periapical Diseases/surgery , Inflammation/radiotherapy , Low-Level Light Therapy , Oral Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Inflammation/etiology
3.
Odonto (Säo Bernardo do Campo) ; 19(38): 131-138, jul.-dez.2011. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-789976

ABSTRACT

Avaliar a efetividade do laser de baixa intensidade (LLLT) no controle da dor pós-operatória em cirurgia de terceiros molares inferiores inclusos, comparando-o com o lado oposto, que não foi exposto ao LLLT, no mesmo indivíduo.Metodologia: participaram do estudo 16 indivíduos, que apresentaram os dentes 38 e 48 inclusos, em posição similar, e que realizaram a remoção dos dentes no mesmo tempo cirúrgico. O laser foi aplicado imediatamente após a remoção do 48 (lado direito - LD), intra-alvéolo, de forma pontual e sobre a região da sutura, em varredura. O mesmo procedimento foi realizado no 38 (lado esquerdo - LE), com o aparelho desligado garantindo o desconhecimento do paciente sobre qual lado recebeu o laser. Todos foram medicados e orientados quanto aos cuidados pós-operatórios e receberam as escalas visuais análogas (VAS) que variavam de 0-10 cm, anotando a ausência ou presença da dor durante 5 dias do lado direito e esquerdo. Os dados foram tabulados e submetidos ao teste de Wilcoxon (p<0,05) comparando-se as médias da VAS de 1 a 5 dias. Resultados: no 3° dia LD e LE, houve diferença estatística significante (p= 0,0284) e do LD a dor foi menor. No 1° e 5° dia houve redução da dor em ambos os lados (LD:p=0,007; LE:p=0,001).Conclusão: dentro dos limites do presente estudo o laser de baixa intensidade mostrou efetividade no controle da dor pós-operatória...


The purpose of the present study was to analyze the effectiveness of LLLT in pain control after impacted third molar removal, comparing it with the opposite side, note exposed to LLLT in the same patient.Methodology: 16 patients who presented both impacted lower third molar in similar position and accepted to remove them in the same operative time were select to this study. LLLT was used immediately after lower right third molar (R3M), intra-socket and after wound closure. The same procedure was done in the opposite side (L3M) but this time the LLLT was not turned on, warrating thus the patient didn´t no which side had received the irradiation. All patients received visual analogue scale (VAS), where they were instructed to write down the presence or absence of pain in the first five postoperative days. Statistical analysis comprised Wilcoxon test (p<0.05), comparing the VAS average data in the first to the fifth postoperative day.Results: the third postoperative day resulted in a statistically significant (p=0.0284) reduction of pain. In the first and fifth day there was pain reduction in both sides (R3m: p=0.0071; L3M: p=0.0010).Conclusion: within the limits of this study LLLT was effective in postoperative pain control...


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Molar/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Tooth Extraction/methods , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Visual Analog Scale
4.
JBC j. bras. odontol. clín ; 2(11): 39-42, set.-out. 1998. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-298298

ABSTRACT

Este artigo trata da abordagem de duas terapêuticas, sendo uma invasiva ou cirúrgica com implante dental, e a outra näo-invasiva e coadjuvante com um aparelho laser semicondutor de baixa potência indicado para uso em odontestomatologia. Essa associaçäo permite que pós-operatórios cirúrgicos näo sejam necessariamente acompanhados de drogas sistêmicas analgésicas e antinflamatórias, devido aos efeitos característicos desse tipo de radiaçäo, representadas também por sua capacidade de estimulaçäo tecidual, levando-nos a buscar também acelerar o resultado clínico almejado. O caso clínico registra o pós-operatório de uma cirurgia com implante osseointegrado do tipo micro-mini, onde os resultados da laserterapia de baixa potência no controle da dor e edema foram surpreendentes clinicamente; além disso, na proservaçäo radiográfica levantamos a hipótese da ocorrência na aceleraçäo do fenômeno biológico e genuíno da osseointegraçäo


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adolescent , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Lasers/therapeutic use , Osseointegration/radiation effects , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Edema/radiotherapy , Lasers/standards
5.
Rev. bras. odontol ; 52(1): 38-42, jan.-fev. 1995. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-159975

ABSTRACT

O propósito desta pesquisa é avaliar comparativamente em duplo-cego cruzado randomizado, a eficácia dos analgésicos paracetamol (500 mg) e paracetamol (500 mg) mais codeína (30 mg) no controle da pós-operatória. O efeito das drogas foi mensurado pelos pacientes e investigado, através de escalas visuais análogas e escalas de categorias durante 24 horas. O paracetamol mais codeína apresentou ligeira superioridade em relaçäo ao paracetamol, porém estatisticamente näo significantes


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Surgery, Oral/standards , Acetaminophen/adverse effects , Codeine/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Double-Blind Method
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL